Nigeria may be losing an estimated $8 billion annually through the crude oil-for-refined products exchange arrangement, better known as crude oil swaps, which the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has with oil traders such as Trafigura, Vitol, Aiteo Energy Resources, Mercuria, Glencore, Taleveras Group Nigeria Limited, Sahara Energy Limited, Etena Oil and Gas Limited, Ontario Oil and Gas and Rahmaniya Oil and Gas.
Of the 445,000 barrels of crude oil per day brought by NNPC to meet its domestic crude refining capacity, slightly under 50 per cent is swapped with commodity traders in exchange for petroleum products which are imported into the country. The other 50 per cent is supposedly refined by NNPCâ€™s refineries.
However, the state-run oil company has said contrary to claims by a Swiss-based non-governmental organisation (NGO), Berne Declaration, that 36 per cent of its crude oil is lifted by Vitol and Trafigura, both Swiss traders, account for 9 per cent of lift contracts.
The corporation also denied that the federal government lost $6.8 billion in oil revenue as a result of the oil swaps it has with Swiss-based companies listed in the NGOâ€™s report, which prompted the probe instituted by the House of Representatives.
Speaking yesterday before an ad hoc committee set up by the House to investigate the allegations made by the Swiss NGO, the Group Managing Director of NNPC, Andrew Yakubu, said the oil corporation never sold crude oil to the firms at below market price as claimed by Berne Declaration in its report.
â€œBy our records, Vitol and Trafigura account for 30.7 million barrels out of the total of 341.07 million barrels sold by the corporation in 2013 lifting. The lifting of Trafigura and Vitol in 2013 therefore represents 9 per cent of the total lifting as against 36 per cent reported by the Berne Declaration,â€ Yakubu explained to the committee chaired by Hon. Muraino Ajibola.
Instead of foreigners dominating the oil deals, the NNPC boss said more chances were given to Nigerian traders, who â€œcollectively accounted for 98.2 million barrels during the same period, other international traders including the Swiss trading companies accounted for 61.2 million barrels, while offshore and the Nigerian refineries took 36.2 and 38.3 million barrels respectively.â€
According to him, the selection of traders has standardised criteria, which evaluate buyersâ€™ facilities, volume of transactions, turnover and financial health of the companies that is applicable to all, including Vitol and Trafigura.
He also added that the 2012/2013 term contracts had a preponderance of Nigerian trading companies with 23 out of the 40 regular buyers.
On the issue of NNPC colluding with Swiss-based traders to sell crude oil at below market price, Yakubu said: â€œOur pricing strategy is aligned to international best practices in the industry. Our prices are based on a reference to the benchmark crude Brent whose prices are published by Platts for the international trading community, a premium/differential for individual crude grades and the selection of an option.â€
He further added that the average of five consecutive days’ publications by Platts provides about 97 per cent of the value of any of its crude blends, while differential/premium account for about three per cent of the total value.
â€œThe differential/premium are established based on a wide range of publications (Platts, Argus, LOR, etc) and internal market assessment by the corporation for all crude grades.
â€œThese processes apply to all buyers of Nigerian crude based on the terms prescribed in the General Sales Agreement entered by all parties. Overall, our assessment of the OSP (differential/premium) has matched or even exceeded the market value of Nigerian crude grade published by Platts, Argus and LOR, as exemplified in the following in the historical performance of the Bonny light since 2005,â€ he added.
Yakubu, who debunked the Berne Declaration report as â€œtrying to portray NNPC in bad lightâ€, said its claim that 100 per cent of Nigerian crude oil is sold through private traders was not true.
On the sale of unutilised crude oil at knockdown prices to Swiss companies through the crude oil-for-products exchange scheme (swap arrangement), Yakubu stated: â€œThe NNPC Act mandates the corporation to supply petroleum products to the federation as supplier of last resort. In order to meet this obligation, 445,000 barrels of crude oil is assigned to the corporation at international price for domestic refining.
â€œThe corporation disposes the unrefined portion of the assignment through direct exports or other secondary arrangements including swaps to ensure procurement and delivery of refined petroleum products,â€ he said.
However, despite the insistence by NNPC that no losses had been made from its crude oil swaps, it has come to the open that the federal government may have incurred losses of a staggering $8 billion annually as a result of the deals with Vitol and Trafigura, among other traders.
The ad hoc committee probing the alleged scam noted that in most cases, the foreign companies do not fulfill their own end of the bargain by refusing to supply refined products.
Documents given to journalists yesterday showed that NNPC allocated about 50 per cent of its 445,000 barrels of crude oil per day meant for domestic refining to the following companies â€“ Vitol Limited, Trafigura, Mercuria, Glencore, Taleveras, Sahara Energy, Etena Oil and Gas, Aiteo Energy, Ontario Oil and Gas and Rahmaniya Oil and Gas.
In the process, $8 billion in under-delivered products from the crude oil swap arrangements has gone down the drain.
A report submitted to the committee by the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) also detailed how four of the oil traders â€œunder-deliveredâ€ 500,075,239.3 litres of products in 2011.
They are: Trafigura (173,786,600 litres); Vitol (654,440.7 litres); Taleveras (152,308,878 litres); Aiteo Nigeria Limited (193,046,590 litres) and Ontario Oil and Gas (180,278,732 litres).
According to the report, Nigeria has lost revenue in billions of dollars, just as it also alleged that some of the oil-trading companies owed the NNPC products worth over $800 million.
The report also showed that Duke Oil Company, a trading subsidiary company of NNPC, was brought in as a middle player to protect some of the local companies used in the swap deals.
However, the NNPC during its presentation at the hearing, stated that the crude oil-for-refined products exchange agreement with Duke Oil Company started in February 1, 2011.
It said the Pipelines and Product Marketing Company (PPMC) allocates 90,000 barrels of crude oil to Duke Oil Company in exchange for the delivery of refined products equivalent to the value of the crude oil.
According to NNPC, Duke Oil Company operates and manages the swap arrangement by loading three cargoes through its nominated operators â€“ Messrs Aiteo Energy Resources, Ontario Oil and Gas and Taleveras Group. Each company handles 30,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
The public hearing continues today.